Archive | 2024/10/12

Ameryka oskarża przywódców Hamasu o zbrodnie. Netanjahu: Nie zabiorę żołnierzy z Gazy

Izrael. Plakat przedstawiający zakładników uprowadzonych przez Hamas 7 października 2023 r. (Fot. REUTERS/Florion Goga)


Ameryka oskarża przywódców Hamasu o zbrodnie. Netanjahu: Nie zabiorę żołnierzy z Gazy

Marta Urzędowska


Departament Stanu USA oskarżył szefów Hamasu o najgorsze zbrodnie. Jednocześnie Amerykanie próbują pomóc osiągnąć rozejm w Gazie, na co nie chcą się zgodzić władze Izraela.

– Od dekad finansują i kierują kampanią mordowania amerykańskich obywateli i narażania bezpieczeństwa Stanów Zjednoczonych – mówił w środę prokurator generalny USA Merrick Garland, tłumacząc, dlaczego Ameryka wystosowała akt oskarżenia wobec kilku najważniejszych terrorystów Hamasu. – To ludzie, którzy kierują wysiłkami Hamasu, by zniszczyć państwo Izrael i od dekad mordują izraelskich cywilów, by ten cel zrealizować – dodał.

Garland przypomniał, że 7 października, podczas ataku Hamasu na Izrael, palestyńscy terroryści „mordowali całe rodziny w najbardziej krwawej masakrze Żydów od Holocaustu”. – Zabijali osoby starsze i najmłodsze dzieci. Uczynili broń z przemocy seksualnej wobec kobiet – w tym z gwałtów i okaleczania narządów płciowych – wyliczał.

Amerykańskie oskarżenie czysto symboliczne. Niektórzy z oskarżonych nie żyją

Jak informuje CBS News, zarzuty pod adresem Hamasu sformułowano już w lutym br., ale dotąd ich nie ujawniano.

Najważniejszy oskarżony to Jahja Sinwar, obecny szef Hamasu, który najpewniej ukrywa się w tunelach pod Gazą. Pozostali to były przywódca politbiura grupy Ismail Hanija, zastępca szefa zbrojnego skrzydła Hamasu Marwan Issa, nadzorujący hamasowców poza Gazą i Zachodnim Brzegiem Jordanu Chalid Maszaal, i dwóch pomniejszych liderów – Muhammad Dejf i Ali Baraka. Hanija, Issa i Dejf w ostatnich miesiącach zginęli.

Na liście zbrodni, jakie Departament Stanu zarzuca hamasowcom, znalazły się m.in. mordowanie dziesiątek obywateli USA, spiskowanie w celu finansowania terroryzmu i korzystanie z broni masowego rażenia. W Ameryce za te przestępstwa grozi dożywocie lub kara śmierci.

Stawianie zarzutów ważnym terrorystom odbywa się w czasie, gdy w Strefie Gazy trwa wojna rozpętana atakiem Hamasu na Izrael z 7 października ub. roku. Palestyńscy terroryści zabili wtedy 1,2 tys. osób, a 250 porwali do Gazy. Ponad sto z nich nadal pozostaje w ich rękach, choć ok. 40 najpewniej nie żyje.

W odpowiedzi na atak izraelska armia rozpoczęła w enklawie operację zbrojną, w której do tej pory zginęło – według wyliczeń Hamasu – ponad 40 tys. osób.

Oskarżenia formułowane dziś przez Waszyngton dotyczą nie tylko październikowego ataku, w którym zginęło co najmniej 43 amerykańskich obywateli, ale też wcześniejszych, prowadzonych dekadami operacji palestyńskich terrorystów. Zarzuty są jednak wyłącznie symboliczne, bo Amerykanie nie zamierzają ścigać hamasowców.

Terroryści opublikowali nagranie z zakładnikami

Powodem, dlaczego Amerykanie akurat teraz informują o oskarżeniach, może być ostatnia wyjątkowo głośna zbrodnia Hamasu. Tydzień temu, gdy izraelscy żołnierze namierzyli miejsce przetrzymywania szóstki izraelskich zakładników i byli blisko ich uwolnienia, terroryści z premedytacją ich zastrzelili. Wśród ofiar był Amerykanin, 23-letni Hersh Goldberg-Polin.

Amerykański prokurator odniósł się do jego śmierci, ogłaszając zarzuty. – Prowadzimy śledztwo w sprawie zamordowania Hersha i wszystkich innych brutalnych zabójstw Amerykanów. Traktujemy je jako akty terroryzmu – przekonywał. Wcześniej zabicie Goldberga-Polina potępił Joe Biden, przyznając, że jego śmierć jest „tak samo tragiczna, jak godna potępienia”. – Hamas odpowie za te zbrodnie – powiedział amerykański przywódca.

Informacja o śmierci zakładników, którzy przetrwali jedenaście miesięcy niewoli i zginęli tuż przed uwolnieniem, wyjątkowo wstrząsnęła Izraelczykami, którzy żądają dealu z Hamasem i sprowadzenia porwanych do domu. W ostatnią niedzielę w kraju zorganizowano potężne protesty, w poniedziałek największy związek zawodowy ogłosił kilkugodzinny strajk generalny.

Dziś, kiedy sytuacja w Izraelu nieco się uspokoiła, terroryści postanowili dolać oliwy do ognia – opublikowali nagranie, na którym widać dwie spośród sześciu zabitych osób, choć nie jest jasne kiedy powstało. 

Netanjahu: Nie zabierzemy żołnierzy z Gazy

Amerykanie nie tylko oskarżają terrorystów, ale próbują też pomóc Izraelczykom się z nimi dogadać. W ostatnich dniach ogłosili, że najwyższy czas „sfinalizować” porozumienie dotyczące rozejmu. – W najbliższych dniach będziemy rozmawiać z negocjatorami z Egiptu i Kataru i naciskać na ostateczne porozumienie – poinformował rzecznik Departamentu Stanu Matthew Miller.

Łatwo nie będzie, bo strony nie mogą się porozumieć w kwestii wycofania izraelskich wojsk z Gazy. Hamas chce, by z enklawy wyszli po wojnie wszyscy żołnierze. Izraelskie władze odpowiadają, że to wykluczone i że zostawią część oddziałów na południu enklawy, w ważnym korytarzu buforowym przy granicy z Egiptem.

Sojusznicy, w tym Amerykanie i Brytyjczycy, naciskają na Izraelczyków, by odpuścili w imię rozejmu, który ma doprowadzić do przerwania walk i uwolnienia izraelskich zakładników, a z czasem także do końca wojny.

Na razie Izrael się sprzeciwia. W środę premier Benjamin Netanjahu powtórzył, że Izrael musi zachować kontrolę nad strefą buforową. Że to niezbędny element, by osiągnąć najważniejszy cel wojny — zniszczenie Hamasu — i niedopuszczenie, by kiedykolwiek powtórzył się atak na Izrael. – Gaza musi być zdemilitaryzowana, a to może się wydarzyć tylko, jeśli ta strefa pozostanie pod naszą pełną kontrolą. Chyba że macie kogoś, kto nas zastąpi i będzie w stanie zapobiec nowym atakom. Jakoś nie widzę nikogo takiego, więc na razie musimy tam zostać – przekonywał na konferencji prasowej.

Netanjahu powtórzył, że nie przekona go nawet dramat zakładników i ich bliskich. – Rozumiem koszmar, jaki przechodzą te rodziny, ale zadaniem liderów nie jest jedynie dzielić ich emocje, ale też podejmować odpowiednie decyzje – stwierdził premier. Odmówił odpowiedzi na pytania kiedy wojna ma szansę się skończyć. – Potrwa tak długo, jak trzeba, żebyśmy wygrali. Myślę, że jesteśmy coraz bliżej zwycięstwa.


Red. Ludmiła Anannikova


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


An Invitation to the Anti-Zionists

An Invitation to the Anti-Zionists


Elisa Albert


You refused to sit on a literary panel with me. I invite you to my Shabbes table instead, so we can actually talk to each other and face our fears.

Tablet Magazine

As I write these words, my challah dough is in the mixer for 20 minutes before going into the fridge overnight.

Tomorrow, before Shabbat, when the time comes to braid and bake, I will break off a piece of dough, the size of an olive, wrap it up twice, and throw it away.

This is an esoteric tradition. A symbolic offering. A form of performative charity. A ridding of excess. A mini sacrifice. A gift. A casting off.

But we’re not there yet.

For now, mixer on hypnotic low, I’m puzzling over how to face the troubling situation at hand: Two writers I don’t know just sabotaged our scheduled panel at a literary festival in my hometown, on purported grounds that they refuse to share space with a “Zionist.”

(Me!)

How odd, to be a loathsome thing in the imaginations of people you’ve never met.

And … I can’t help but wonder if either of these people actually knows the definition of Zionism.

Let me help: Zionism is the belief that the State of Israel has the right to exist. Zionism is the belief that the Jewish people (literally aka “Israel”) has the right to self-determination, peace, and safety in our ancestral homeland. Zionism precludes no other peaceful nationalist ambitions or aspirations.

There are as many flavors and shades of Zionism as there are Jews alive on planet Earth. Zionism is nonbinary. Zionism is de-colonization. Zionism means, not to put too fine a point on it, that there is a place where people like me can (theoretically) exist free from the precise bullshit at hand.

Use of the word “Zionist” as a permissible pejorative is a tool of brainwashed propagandists to dehumanize the people of Israel, wherever we reside, and to blame “us” for the horrific ongoing violence in an achingly, tragically, nightmarishly endless regional conflict, the latest conflagrations of which have inflamed many a conspiracist imagination and inspired many a nihilistic trauma tourist.

This, it is apparently not needless to say, helps zero Palestinian civilians or Muslims or Christian Arabs or Bedouins or Druze or assimilated diaspora quasi-Jews or Western gentiles looking for cheap thrills in anarchist drag. It brings zero relief to anyone directly impacted by this intractable, gruesome conflict. Not in Gaza, not in the Galilee, not in the Negev, not in Judea or Samaria, not in East Jerusalem. Not in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, or Iran.

It simply further entrenches a stale, appalling, hopeless status quo.

It does, however, allow a couple of writers who live in New York and Connecticut to play at a form of primal social-political-personal pseudo-identitarian catharsis (which I guess isn’t nothing!).

Oh, the short, half-life payoffs of misplaced nationalism: It’s like a drug, in how precious little it asks of you.

In the past year, our tribe (I wonder if it helps to categorize “us” thusly … in that no reasonable person could feel politically/culturally/personally entitled to spew bigotry toward, say, Native Americans) has witnessed a tsunami of historical erasure, misinformation, and confusion about Judaism in general and Israel in particular.

Most shocking has been the specter of “allies” in so many progressive movements—anti-racism, queer liberation, art, feminism, education, pronoun-preferences, equality, sex-positivity, diversity, size-inclusive slow fashion, witty tote bags—eagerly, carelessly parroting some of the laziest, most twisted antisemitic ideas and incitement known to human history.

People like me—which is to say “Zionists,” which is to say Jews with a basic understanding of, interest in, and emotional/intellectual/familial investment in communal care for lived Judaism and “other” Jews—have been screaming about this for almost a year, now.

(Because of, you know, that unspeakable thing that happened almost a year ago.)

The heart, as poet Mary Oliver wrote, breaks and breaks and lives by breaking.

Anyway, the literary festival.

Our panel was to have been called “Girls, Coming of Age.”

When I agreed to moderate it, months ago, I privately rolled my eyes. Sure, yeah, whatever: “Girls.” Whatever that’s supposed to mean, in whoever’s imagination, for whatever purposes of rote reduction, simplification, and/or condescension.

I and the other writers in question all happen to be middle-aged, but “Women, Having Come of Age” doesn’t have the same appeal, I guess. Nor, say, “People With Vaginas, Existing in Time.”

(Meanwhile, can you imagine a panel of middle-aged male novelists being grouped together under the banner of “Boys Will Be Boys”?)

Alas, we’ll have to save the exegesis of gender for another op-ed. Squabbles over genitalia, costume, behavior, eros, and role-playing suddenly seem so adorably quaint. Everything skews a bit different in wartime.

Back to my challah.

The following day, I braid the risen dough and discard that small piece, size of an olive. Subtext alert! Olives grow on branches on trees. Many such trees exist in the Holy Land. Many a mediocre meditation on the long, gruesome conflict between Arabs and Jews in said land feature rhapsodic asides about lost olive trees. The olive branch in the mouth of the dove after the flood is a promise of … you got this.

As I remove that little piece of dough, I make a conscientious effort to symbolically remove some of the ugliness of this situation—the idiotic boycott, the utter failure of the overseeing cultural institution to unequivocally call it out, the scab ripped off so much generational trauma and rage and grief and fear over the past year, the general and specific horrors of war—from my life, body, mind, heart, and soul, if only for this brief, passing moment in time.

And while the challah rises in the oven, I wonder: What if the anti-Zionists had been brave (or brazen) enough to show up and appear alongside me at that literary festival?

What if, despite imagining me to be their enemy, and the enemy, I imagine they imagine, of everything good and decent and right in the world, they had been able to maintain even a shred of curiosity?

How many ways might we have connected? Around our “female”-ness, parenthood, I like your earrings/thanks, where’d you get those boots/I like how you wrote this one line/how’s publishing been for you/what does your tattoo mean/oh I love that pizza place too.

Might I have managed to disarm them with a joke?

Might I have put them at ease with my aspirational calm, the tenor of my speaking voice, some intentional somatic sweetness?

Might they, then, have forgotten, for a fraction of a second, their absurd conviction that I am—or am magically all-inclusively representative of—their enemy?

Might there have been some way of offering them an explicit or implicit assurance that I do not, in fact, crave the blood of gentile children?

Why is it so existentially frightening to see the “other” as potentially human and worthy of space?

(Wrong, I imagine them saying! I love “others!” It’s just you nasty warmongering Zionist monsters I will not abide!)

A hero makes a friend of his enemy, says the peace activist Bassam Aramin in Colum McCann’s ambitious novel Apeirogon, which would be a wonderful selection for discussion at next year’s book festival, incidentally.

I so wish those misguided authors could have found the courage to show up to meet me, their Big Bad Zio Bitch.

In scant public statements about this debacle, both have thus far avoided any personal accountability. They’ve misrepresented the events leading to the cancellation of the panel, they’ve mischaracterized what I’ve written and posted since the war began, and they’ve set their Instagrams to private.

“They know not what they do,” a particularly famous Jew is purported to have said.

And lookie-look how this begins to devolve into a she-said/she-said/she-said show. You know: a “girl” fight! (We should at least sell tickets.)

But the last thing on earth anyone needs is more anger, more resentment, more fighting, more hatred, more blood, more violence, heads to roll.

Haven’t we had enough, yet, of anger, fear, suspicion, hatred, fighting, bloodshed?

Are more rolling heads really the answer? More purges!?

It’s the month of Elul, a time for opening our hearts to the work of personal restitution and reconciliation. (It’s also “Banned Books Week,” funnily enough.)

So, let’s take this shit-pile of a situation and spin it into something positive. Jewish alchemy! Fun.

Here’s a new and different opportunity. As long as we’re alive, it’s never too late. The great privilege of getting to try and try again.

I take my perfectly golden-brown challah out of the oven and wish to be able to share it with my “enemies.”

Who are they, underneath the stank of fear and confusion and miseducation and epigenetic trauma and algorithmic waylay and perhaps, I don’t know, maybe a smidge of ideological perversion?

What’s the worst that could happen? They don’t like my menu? They don’t like my traditions? They don’t like my decor? They lack manners? They are ungracious? The conversation is stilted? They talk smack on the way home?

Let’s grow up, people, and take on the scary necessity of dealing with ourselves and each other. We are the only ones who can do it. No one is coming to save us.

In order to actually “come of age” (instead of remaining forever petulant, cliquish, shallow, oppositional, imitative, anxious “girls”), we have to face our fears.

Aisha Gawad and Lisa Ko, please come join me at my Shabbes table, so we can break bread together, and talk. It’s the only way.


Elisa Albert is the author of three novels and a story collection. Her fiction and essays have appeared in n+1, the Guardian, The New York TImes, New York Magazine, Lilith, Bennington Review, Michigan Quarterly Review, and elsewhere. THE SNARLING GIRL, now out from Clash Books, represents a decade’s worth of personal essays and literary criticism. 


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com


The media must stop presenting antisemitism as legitimate criticism – opinion

The media must stop presenting antisemitism as legitimate criticism – opinion

DAVID BEN-BASAT


The Palestinian ideology, which views the land on which Israel was established as occupied territory “from the river to the sea” aims for the Jewish state to cease to exist..

Washington, D.C., USA November 14, 2023: Pro-Israel supporters stand, draped in the Israeli flag, with arms around each other. / (photo credit: SHUTTERSTOCK)

Radical Islamic groups, alongside extreme right- and left-wing groups, which seemingly have nothing in common, have discovered a shared hatred for Jews and Israel. What once appeared to be legitimate criticism of Israel has turned into declared antisemitism that has escalated since the October 7 massacre perpetrated by Hamas in Israel.

The bloody attack and the hostile media coverage that followed it marked a significant rise in antisemitism today.

Antisemitism began to develop globally hundreds of years ago for various reasons. Scholars of antisemitism suggest that Muslims blamed Jews for not recognizing the mission of Mohammed; Christians blamed them for rejecting the teachings of Jesus even killing him.

The Muslim persecution of Jews did not begin with the establishment of Israel. The claim that Jews and Muslims lived in peace until the rise of Zionism is nothing more than a myth. Mohammed and his followers slaughtered Jews, viewing them as impure, calling them descendants of monkeys and pigs.

The notion, perpetuated by the international media and even within the Israeli Left, that the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel would resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is utter nonsense. The Palestinian ideology, which views the land on which Israel was established as occupied territory “from the river to the sea” aims for the Jewish state to cease to exist.

This picture shows projectiles above Jerusalem, on October 1, 2024. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards said a missile attack under way against Israel on October 1 was in response to the killing of Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah last week as well as that of the Hamas leader (credit: MENAHEM KAHANA / AFP)

The Islamic Republic of Iran – harking back to the Persian empire of old – seeks to destroy the Jews (and the Jewish state); and Palestinians, along with the antisemitic Turkish leader Tayyip Erdogan, share the same murderous ideology.

A history of antisemitism

Hatred and antisemitism toward Jews are not new phenomena. Beginning in the 11th century and during the Crusades to Jerusalem, the situation of Jews worsened, reaching its peak 200 years later with the medieval massacres of Jews who refused to convert to Christianity – and the persecution by the Spanish Inquisition of those who had converted.

Jews were accused of all the world’s troubles, from the Black Death in the Middle Ages, which wiped out over a third of Europe’s population, to the murder of children (known as “blood libels”), claimed Jews used the blood of Christian youngsters to make matzah for Passover. Today’s antisemitism mirrors the antisemitism of the past, the same one we thought had nearly disappeared after World War II.

The world that stood by while the Nazis murdered six million Jews is standing by once again. History is beginning to repeat itself.

Modern Jew hatred

TODAY’S ANTISEMITISM is fueled by the media under the guise of legitimate criticism of Israel. The British newspaper The Independent calls Israel “child killers,” while the BBC and SKY news networks in the United Kingdom rarely cover Hamas’s crimes and instead focus on one-sided and uninformed criticism of Israel. This is not journalism; it is ignorance and antisemitism. 

The term “child killers” is an old Christian phrase, rehashed by writers in the British press. The Norwegian antisemitic writer Jostein Gaarder also uses the term “child killers.” In his ignorance, Gaarder does not understand that a Muslim takeover of his country is only a matter of time.

Antisemitism distorts the minds of many journalists, who see Israel as a brutal occupier that treats Palestinians as the Nazis treated Jews. Unfortunately, this warped opinion is held by a significant percentage of Europeans.

Last month, Flemish columnist Herman Brusselmans accused Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of child murder in his regular column in the Flemish publication HUMO in Belgium. 

Among other things, Brusselmans wrote, “I am so angry I want to shove a sharp knife into the throat of every Jew I encounter.” Thankfully, after reading his repugnant words, the European Jewish Association (EJA) appealed to Belgium’s Attorney General, demanding the arrest of the columnist for incitement to murder. The organization also contacted the magazine’s editorial team, demanding they suspend the writer immediately before further calls for the murder of Jews appeared in his columns.

Israel’s Ambassador to Belgium Idit Abum Ronsweig responded to the column: “In a country where Jews are attacked daily and 70% fear for their lives, how did this pass editorial review? Antisemitism and legitimization of violence should be a red line, even for the verbal outburst of an ‘intellectual’ in a leftist magazine.” She pointed out that, had similar statements been made against Muslims, there would have been a major outcry.

The Federation of Jewish Communities in the Czech Republic (FJC) reported 4,328 antisemitic incidents in 2023, compared to 2,277 in 2022, representing a 90% increase.

A new comprehensive survey reveals a significant and alarming rise in antisemitism toward Jewish teenagers in high schools worldwide, following the events of October 7. The findings show a global increase of 29.1% in the feeling of antisemitism among Jewish teenagers, with a sharp rise of 45.9% outside the United States. The survey, conducted by Mosaic Youth, a division of Mosaic United, a joint initiative of Israel’s Diaspora Affairs Ministry and Jewish philanthropists, paints a worrying picture of the reality faced by young Jews worldwide.

Nearly half of respondents experienced antisemitism personally, mainly in school settings. Particularly troubling is the fact that over two-thirds of Jewish youth identified classmates as the primary source of hostility. 

The survey also reveals a disturbing trend of antisemitism among school staff, with a quarter of respondents reporting antisemitic remarks from teachers and administrators. Furthermore, a significant percentage of students encountered antisemitic content in their educational material.

The consequences of this reality are evident in significant behavioral changes among Jewish students. Many have begun avoiding wearing Jewish symbols, hesitating to post Jewish or Israeli content on social media, and even feeling the need to hide their Jewish identity.

In meetings I hold in my consular capacity with diplomats at home and abroad, I am sometimes astonished by the ignorance and naivety of diplomats, respected representatives of nations, who do not understand the meaning of the phrase: “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” They are surprised when I explain that this phrase means nothing less than the destruction of Israel.

As a media professional for decades, I believe that Israel has not fully understood the importance of a strong international public relations strategy and has not acted professionally enough to combat the disinformation and lies spread by our enemies. 

Once again, I urge Israel to recruit professional influencers and opinion leaders and adequately fund its public relations efforts.


The writer is the CEO of Radios 100FM, honorary consul general of Nauru, vice dean of the Consular Corps, president of the Israeli Radio Broadcasters Association, and vice president of Israel’s Ambassador Club.


Zawartość publikowanych artykułów i materiałów nie reprezentuje poglądów ani opinii Reunion’68,
ani też webmastera Blogu Reunion’68, chyba ze jest to wyraźnie zaznaczone.
Twoje uwagi, linki, własne artykuły lub wiadomości prześlij na adres:
webmaster@reunion68.com